1st aerial - AirBQ 9GHz

[Insider]

Byla by zajimava tabulka ktera by uvadela typicke latence pri urcite propustnosti, tak by si kazdy mohl vybrat zda pro nej ma cenu dany spoj provozovat na dane pateri nebo ne. Bylo by mozne tedy tuto rekneme orientacni tabulku vyrobit kapacita/latence?

Něco vypracuju, ale rozhodně to není na páteřní spoje Od toho tu máme jiné železo.

Úroveň signálu cca -67dBm

AirBQ 400m 20MHz šířky pásma 130Mbit fyzické rychlosti vypnutý AirMax

Volny spoj
PING 10.10.9.248 (10.10.9.248) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.881 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.943 ms
.
.
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.04 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.908 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.934 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 10006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.881/0.932/1.049/0.062 ms

10Mbit FDX prutoku TCP
ping 10.10.9.248
PING 10.10.9.248 (10.10.9.248) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.65 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.04 ms
.
.

64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.952 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=2.37 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 15 received, 0% packet loss, time 14045ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.934/2.027/3.791/1.038 ms

20Mbit FDX
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=4.04 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=4.13 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=1.55 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=2.66 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29116ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.927/3.169/8.150/1.659 ms

35FDX
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=3.14 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=4.69 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=4.13 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=3.90 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=3.49 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=3.58 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29172ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.958/4.424/10.491/1.973 ms



AirBQ 400m 40MHz šířky pásma 130Mbit fyzické rychlosti zapnutý AirMax

70Mbit FDX

64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=79 ttl=64 time=8.11 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=80 ttl=64 time=5.63 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=81 ttl=64 time=10.3 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=82 ttl=64 time=5.93 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
82 packets transmitted, 82 received, 0% packet loss, time 81329ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.110/5.807/15.309/4.320 ms
michal@1aerial:~$


85Mbit FDX
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=19.5 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=41.2 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=19.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=17.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=48.5 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
38 packets transmitted, 38 received, 0% packet loss, time 37148ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.196/26.485/60.846/11.335 ms



AirBQ 400m 40MHz šířky pásma 300Mbit fyzické rychlosti vypnutý AirMax
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=30.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=35.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=21.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=18.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=13.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=32.8 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 15 received, 0% packet loss, time 14045ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.482/29.736/40.085/7.355 ms
michal@1aerial:~$

Absolutní kotel cca 95/96Mbit

64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=178 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=187 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=196 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=163 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=165 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=162 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=39 ttl=64 time=156 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
39 packets transmitted, 36 received, 7% packet loss, time 38151ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.264/136.880/196.163/59.100 ms


S AirMaxem absolutní kotel 97/97Mbit
bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=69.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=68.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=60.2 ms

--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 28 received, 6% packet loss, time 5921ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.542/75.845/132.945/18.545 ms
michal@1aerial:~$

Traffic 90/30Mbit AirMax On, 40MHz

michal@1aerial:~$ ping 10.10.9.248 -c 30 -i 0.2
PING 10.10.9.248 (10.10.9.248) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=6.81 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=7.34 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=8.24 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=5.02 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=4.84 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=3.26 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=8.72 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4.93 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=6.06 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=4.14 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=8.13 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=6.85 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=7.39 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=5.41 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=4.84 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=4.79 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=6.12 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=12.5 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=6.46 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=2.74 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=3.69 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=6.20 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=4.00 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=5.38 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=4.58 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=8.78 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=6.28 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=4.81 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=6.70 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=8.90 ms

--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 5916ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.747/6.135/12.508/2.019 ms
michal@1aerial:~$

[Insider]

a jsou k dispozici i ty offsety?

Budou.. Teď se finishuje na elektronice

[hapi]

nemáš tam chybu? nemělo by u toho poslendího testu bejt 40Mbit a fyzická rychlost na 300Mbit? Pak totiž nechápu jak by ta m prolez Absolutní kotel cca 95/96Mbit.

[Viktor Novotný]

.... odstranujou se dratkove propojky skrze cely plosnak ?

[Insider]

.... odstranujou se dratkove propojky skrze cely plosnak ?

Uz jsou pryc Jsou moc drahý

[Insider]

nemáš tam chybu? nemělo by u toho poslendího testu bejt 40Mbit a fyzická rychlost na 300Mbit? Pak totiž nechápu jak by ta m prolez Absolutní kotel cca 95/96Mbit.

Jasný

[miract]

AirBQ 400m 40MHz šířky pásma 3000Mbit fyzické rychlosti vypnutý AirMax
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=30.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=35.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=21.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=18.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=13.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=32.8 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 15 received, 0% packet loss, time 14045ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.482/29.736/40.085/7.355 ms
michal@1aerial:~$

Kam se na vas hrabe gigabeam a podobne... 3000Mbit ve 40MHz.

[Insider]

AirBQ 400m 40MHz šířky pásma 3000Mbit fyzické rychlosti vypnutý AirMax
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=30.7 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=35.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=21.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=18.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=13.4 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.9.248: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=32.8 ms
^C
--- 10.10.9.248 ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 15 received, 0% packet loss, time 14045ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.482/29.736/40.085/7.355 ms
michal@1aerial:~$

Kam se na vas hrabe gigabeam a podobne... 3000Mbit ve 40MHz.

Už brzy Njn.

[pfadmin]

U velkých pingů je rozdíl oproti malým jakej? Pokud to znamená, že se to chová jako ubnt na stole, tak je to ok, ale přijde mi, že ubnt na stole se chová jinak, jaké povahy je ten traffik? Je tvrdej s hafo spojeními, nebo měkkej s max. pár spojeními? Díky za odpověď.

[Insider]

UBNT na stole se chova jako v nezarusenem prostredi, tedy stejne jako AirBQ na střeše. Test byl s klasickým 64byte pingem, traffic byl generovaný 2 mikrotikama v TCP modu. 20 spojeni.

[midnight_man]

kolko to stoji jeden spoj tychto air bq? kukam ze u nas je tiez mozne pouzivat tieto zariadenia na bezpecnostne systémy za podmienok 25mW/1Mhz

[David2006]

Co vím tak 30tis+DPH za dvě NS M5 Loca...teda s nálepkou od 1Antení .

[Insider]

Co vím tak 30tis+DPH za dvě NS M5 Loca...teda s nálepkou od 1Antení .

Hele není to nalepka ale sitotisk Jo ?

Jinak .. poslední kolečko se moc nepovedlo, funguje vcelku dobre, ale je tam spousta manualnich ukonu, které jsme chteli postupne vylucovat. Poslal jsem prvni uvolneni na poradnik, takze brzo pujdou prvni kousky ven. Uzivatelsky to ma uz cilove parametry. vyrobne technicky nas ceka dalsi kolo.

[midnight_man]

to musite prerabat prave loca? Preco neprerobite nanobridge? alebo velke nano ? Ostatne za 30 tis + DPH mi to pride hodne malo muziky.

[ocior]

to musite prerabat prave loca? Preco neprerobite nanobridge? alebo velke nano ? Ostatne za 30 tis + DPH mi to pride hodne malo muziky.

Co si predstavit tu 9GHz antenu co tam musi byt?